• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
The Mantua Group

The Mantua Group

Simple Black and White Asset Management, Reliability Expertise, and Maintenance Execution Perfection.

  • About Us
    • Meet Our Founder
    • Meet Our Team
    • Scientific Legacy – A Century of Innovation
  • Services
    • Availability Simulation
    • Reliability Centered Maintenance
    • Fault Tree Analysis
    • Reliability Engineering
    • Asset Management
    • Asset Reliability
    • Asset Management and Reliability Consulting
    • Root Cause Analysis
    • Reliability Program Assessment
    • Maintenance Planning & Scheduling
      • Transportation
    • FMEA/FMECA
    • Condition Monitoring Assessment
    • Vulnerability Assessment and Analysis
    • Weibull/Failure Data/Survival – Analysis
    • Other Services
      • Transportation
      • Temporary Fencing
      • Photography
      • Carpet Cleaning
  • Software
    • Isograph Software
      • Availability Workbench
        • Accelerated Life Testing (ALT)
        • Availability Simulation
        • AWB’s Maximo Portal
        • AWB’s SAP Portal
        • RCMCost
        • Weibull Module
        • Process Reliability
        • AWB API
        • AWB Enterprise
      • Reliability Workbench
        • Event Tree Analysis Software
        • Fault Tree Analysis (FTA)
        • FMEA – FMECA
        • Markov Analysis
        • Reliability Block Diagrams (RBD)
        • Reliability Growth Modeling
        • Reliability Prediction
        • RWB Weibull Module
        • RWB – System Safety Analysis (SSA)
        • RWB API
        • RWB Enterprise
        • Reliability Parts Libraries
      • Network Availability Prediction (NAP)
      • HAZOP Analysis
      • Attack Tree Software
      • Life Cycle Cost Software
      • Data Link Manager External Systems
    • PeakAvenue Software
      • PeakAvenue FaultTree+
      • Digital Thread
      • eQMS Platform
      • FMEA Software
      • Quality Management Systems
      • System Function Analysis
      • Supply Chain Management
    • Sologic Software
      • Causelink® Software
      • Causelink® RCA Software & Training
  • Resources
    • Reliability Concepts
      • Model What Matters
      • CMMS Reliability Integration
      • Functional Safety & SIL
      • P-F Interval & Condition Monitoring
      • RCM Decision Engine
      • Spare Parts Optimisation
      • Lifecycle Cost Analysis
      • Monte Carlo Availability Simulation
      • Suspended Data Analysis
      • Reliability Without Failure Data
      • Risk Matrix Modeling
      • RBD vs. Fault Tree
    • Insights & News
    • White Papers
    • Case Studies
    • Podcasts
  • Industries
    • Mining
    • Rail
    • Automotive
    • Medical Technology
    • Aerospace
    • Electronics
    • Manufacturing
    • IT Security
    • Networks
    • Food and Beverage
    • Agriculture
    • Pharmaceutical
    • Defense
    • Steel
    • Super Alloy
    • Rubber
  • Utilities
  • Training
  • Contact Us
  • Show Search
Hide Search

Philip Sage

One Size Fits All – or Not

Discover why one size fits all approaches often fail to deliver. In this episode, I speak with Philip Sage about organizations’ challenges with recording failure data and making the most of it, how this affects their ability to make data-driven decisions, and their inability to apply an Asset Management framework specific to their risk profile.

If you want to learn more about creating an Asset Management framework tailored to your needs reach out to Philip Sage through LinkedIn.

Getting it Right

Join Philip and Fred as they discuss the need to purchase, install, and maintain equipment with precision.
Topics include:

  • Philip Sage shares a transformative story about a mechanic learning from vibration data and improving maintenance work.
  • Emphasis on maintenance fundamentals: alignment, tightness, lubrication.
  • Fred Schenkelberg and Philip Sage discuss the evolution from reactive to planned, precision-focused maintenance.
  • Discussion about impact of senior management support and continuous improvement to maintain top-tier performance.

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Competing Risks or Not

Join Philip and Fred as they discuss the difference in data analysis and results when the dataset does or does not have competing risks of failure.
Topics include:

  • What are competing risks?
  • The extreme value family of distributions.
  • Does your software just assume competing risks?

Enjoy an episode of Speaking of Reliability. Where you can join friends as they discuss reliability topics. Join us as we discuss topics ranging from design for reliability techniques to field data analysis approaches.

Play

Podcast: Play in new window | Download

Industry Research by The Mantua Group

industry research

UTILITY INSIGHTS

June 2025 Edition – Bridging Qualitative and Quantitative Research in Asset Management


Feature Article: A Mixed-Methods Approach to Asset Performance


Background

Modeling asset performance is essential for ensuring reliability and efficiency in the electrical utility sector. However, the early retirement of assets, informed by qualitative health indices like dissolved gas analysis (DGA), introduces informative censoring. This challenge limits the reliability of quantitative service life models, impacting decision-making and resource optimization.


The Research

This study develops a mixed-methods framework that integrates qualitative health assessments with quantitative modeling to address these challenges. The research examines how qualitative health indices influence early retirement decisions and their effects on statistical evaluations of asset service life.

  • Quantitative Analysis: Evaluates right-censored service life data to enhance modeling accuracy.
  • Qualitative Insights: Investigates DGA-derived health indices, categorizing assets into states like “Good” or “Faulty.”
  • Methodology Adaptation: Refines traditional qualitative approaches to suit industry needs, prioritizing scientific measurements over social methods.

Impact

This framework reduces prediction errors, enhancing asset management and resource allocation. The study’s findings support improved reliability analysis and operational strategies while offering a scalable model for integrating qualitative and quantitative approaches across industries.


Learn More
Explore more industry innovations – contact us today!

Root Cause Analysis and Defect Elimination with Philip Sage

In this episode, I speak with Philip Sage about Root Cause Analysis and Defect Elimination.

Akshay wanted to understand the difference between both and learn where they can be applied. Philip shares his experiences and what defect elimination can do for your organization.

If you want to learn more about Defect Elimination, you can reach out to Philip on LinkedIn.

Key Points

Differences between Defect Elimination and Root Cause Analysis.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Go to Next Page »

Software Expertise

Reliability Workbench (RWB)
Availability WorkBench (AWB)
Network Availability Prediction (NAP)
Sologic Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
HAZOP

Terms & Policies

Terms of Service
Privacy Policy
Support Terms
Cookie Policy

Useful Links

FAQ
Training
Latest News
Support

Follow Us

  • LinkedIn

The Mantua Group

Copyright © 2026 The Mantua Group · Site Designed by The Red Checker · Log in